DAILY BLOG EDITOR, Martyn Bradbury, warned its readers recently that reducing Climate Change is now the only possible solution for Aotearoa-New Zealand. Reducing the continuous rise in global warming would have been possible if major industrialized nations had taken action 50 years ago. Unfortunately, they refused to make the necessary adjustments, and it is now too late. Accelerating Climate Change has already reached us, and the consequences are worsening.
The “loose alliance of millions and billions” (borrowing the quote from Paul Simon) that runs the world knows that it is too late to save industrial development as we know it. Their extraordinary involvement with the airspace and intermediate planets demonstrates this awful realization.
They want to leave the chaos they have created behind them, and spread the evil virus that is mercilessly destroying the environment. All nonsense, of course. Nowhere in our solar system can humans establish a permanent colony, and it is doubtful whether the necessary technology for astronomy will be developed. Physics is physics – and physics says “No.”
All of this raises the question: “Can We Have a Climate Change?” Right here, in Aotearoa-New Zealand, is it possible to build a fortune with people who can support five million people? Is autarky a good option?
For those who do not know the phrase: “Autarky is a culture of self-reliance, which is often applied to groups, regions, countries and their economic systems.” (Wikipedia)
Only the Māori can speak legitimately about the economic and social conditions created by being self-reliant in Aotearoa. From the early 15th century until the end of the 19th century, islanders lived without any contact with the outside world or assistance. All production of food, equipment and medicine was internal, as was the trade in goods and services. For nearly five centuries, in many small villages, the Māori lived alone in the archipelago. At any point between 1300CE and 1800CE, however, he agrees that the number of these distant people did not exceed 150,000.
Can we expect to succeed? Our first thought is to say “True!” But a little forethought should be needed to weaken our hope. New Zealand, as we know, would not have been possible without a global system of transport and trade. Climate change could weaken Northern Hemisphere companies, and the supply chain that New Zealanders depend on could be disrupted. How long would our people endure if the ships from the North stopped coming?
Now, by this time many Kiwi have argued that New Zealand is one of the best food producers in the world – so we will not starve. The truth of the matter, however, is that New Zealand is not an agricultural society. Without the fertilizer we dug in Nauru, which we now import from the Kingdom of Morocco, the grass on which our entire manufacturing sector depends would weaken us. Ships from the North are essential for our well-being.
Not the most important part of all the products is the drugs that prevent the world’s most dangerous diseases. At present, New Zealand does not have a manufacturing facility to say. As a result, if the ships do not stop coming, then tens of thousands will die of starvation.
One of the first priorities of Aotearoa-New Zealand self-reliance, therefore, will be the creation of start-up medical companies. The use of the term “originals” is intentional, because in a global economy that is severely disrupted by increasing climate change, finding the most advanced technology needed to make anything but simple products would be extremely difficult – if not impossible. .
The problem is: laying hands on the necessary machinery, and the machinery needed to operate; it can get worse.
If you have ever been fascinated by images of damaged, rusty and large tanks, in the ruins of the Third World, then you have already encountered the distractions of the “regions”. Tanks are a very complex machine, which is constantly damaged. If the replacement tools needed to operate them are not available, then these dangerous machine guns are useless – useless metal.
The truth about tanks, of course, is also the case with John Deere tractors, and all other agricultural implements that make New Zealand copies so productive.
This problem should first give all opponents that, in order to prevent the islands from being ravaged by climate change refugees, we need to contribute to an unprecedented level in our history. Security costs, he says, should rise – significantly. But, unless we want (unwisely) to make companies that make large, straight-line weapons, the “Fortress New Zealand” dispute is meaningless.
Any country that makes weapons at once makes itself a warrior and technically dependent on a country that is armed.
Imagine access to the most basic of weapons, the most common type of assault rifle. As soon as the shooting starts, some of the stored weapons will soon be gone. What do they do? Basically, it asks the dealer for his weapons to add more. If, for some reason, the US, or the UK, or Australia, tells New Zealand “No.” Or, perhaps: “Sorry, friend, we can’t leave anything right now”, then the automatic guns are immediately like expensive metal rods. Obviously, if the weapons your country needs are fighter jets or warships, then the difficulties of delivering and repairing grow a thousandfold.
The “New Zealand Wall” is a pipe tune – unless, of course, we allow ourselves to be in the United States or Australia (the most likely way, if from regions) or, perhaps, China. Even so, the whole survival scenario is based on the assumption that armored ships from the North are coming.
Sociologists tell us that, shortly after the arrival of the first Polynesian travelers on the islands, the huge cruise ships carrying them from here to place between Aotearoa and their Pacific islands. Eventually, though, boats from the North stopped coming. The men and women who came to this, the great areas that finally succumbed to the work of the people, were left alone.
Until new naval vessels arrived from the North.
If the ships had not arrived, “Aotearoa” would have survived. But, without its constant and profound integration with the rest of the world: the most vulnerable integration and accelerating Climate Change; “New Zealand” cannot exist.
Original Article reposted fromSource link
Disclaimer: The website autopost contents from credible news sources and we are not the original creators. If we Have added some content that belongs to you or your organization by mistake, We are sorry for that. We apologize for that and assure you that this won’t be repeated in future. If you are the rightful owner of the content used in our Website, please mail us with your Name, Organization Name, Contact Details, Copyright infringing URL and Copyright Proof (URL or Legal Document) aT spacksdigital @ gmail.com
I assure you that, I will remove the infringing content Within 48 Hours.